I was asked why Bayesianism is not an epistemology and what is alternative. Answers in http://meaningness.com/probability-and-logic … & http://meaningness.com/metablog/how-to-think … …
-
The operative (and human-complete) word here is "works." But the "keep/discard" part of the rule is simple and universal.
-
-
Yeah, I know only Popper of those, but I think his story is simplistic and does not match what scientists actually do.
-
It may not match scientists' day-to-day practice, but it matches science at some level of description (the relevant lvl, IMO).
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.