Hillary as diligent listener rather than charismatic speaker. Explains so much. (Counterpoints welcome.) http://www.vox.com/a/hillary-clinton-interview/the-gap-listener-leadership-quality …
-
-
Replying to @KevinSimler
do you agree with the thesis? I bought the premise though not necessarily the dichotomy (i.e. you can be one but not the other)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hari_arul
I agree with the thesis (tentatively, as always). I missed the "dichotomy" part, but yeah, it doesn't have to be either/or.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
imo just being good listener isn't enough. leader should have strong bias and then be willing to modify that via listening
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hari_arul
Honest question: why is having a strong bias necessary or good? Can't leadership be directionless (mediation & balancing)?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler
in a startup couldn't work bc of need to bias to action since default mode is failure. i get that is my bias :)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
yes, this hits nail on the head. And since I tend to think political action is overrated, I wonder how much action-bias is needed
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.