It's thinly-veiled one-upmanship: my taste/discernment is better than yours. I'm not like that in other areas of life. Why art? 2/
-
-
-
I'd never pooh-pooh someone for learning from a more "basic" book than the ones I read, for example. 3/
-
Probably better to treat aesthetic experiences like learning experiences: If it works for you, awesome. 4/
-
There's still a role for criticism, of course, but it crosses the line when its directed at someone else's enjoyment. 5/
-
Kinda related: Make Love Not Flamewars https://bitquabit.com/post/make-love-not-flamewars/ … (warning: tech-related, not art-related)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
it may be part of the game, but I don't have to play :P
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
absolutely, lots of value in discussing art. but I don't think it requires one-upmanship.
-
just like intellectual discussions don't require "I'm smarter than you" subtexts
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
These are both great. I've experienced a lot more of #2 than #1 though. Great critics help clarify my chaotic thoughts
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That was great. (Also a good reminder that when it comes to art, I'm way out of my depth =/.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.