@KevinSimler @Meaningness The more wealth-extractive your group, the more effective dominance can be, the more parasitical the leaders are?
-
-
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart@Meaningness OK yeah, makes sense. If your goal is to extract/be a parasite, you won't go beyond the lip of the volcano?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler@paulbaumgart Or maybe: there are multiple routes to prestige, accessible to different sorts of people; only some require s-s.3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@paulbaumgart This has to be true. Although I might argue that all prestige requires s-s, but not all is -EV fitness-wise2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler@paulbaumgart Why would all prestige require self-sacrifice? (Various people have argued that this is true only in Christianity1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@paulbaumgart No one wants to follow a person who's always and only looking out for #1. Even kings lead troops into battle/etc.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler@paulbaumgart Not sure this is factually true :-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@paulbaumgart Not all kings/not all battles, but the gist is that leaders need to step up and stick their necks out. No?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler@paulbaumgart I don’t know! That meme is certainly common, but whether it fits reality, I have little idea.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@paulbaumgart If leaders don't provide value to followers, why would anyone follow them?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Meaningness @paulbaumgart There's extraction/dominance, but that's a distinct strategy (IMO) from leadership/prestige.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.