@Meaningness Great point. Can you generalize? One factor is probably dominance-based vs. loyalty-based leadership.
-
-
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler@Meaningness Is there a relationship to rent-seeking vs. innovation?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart@Meaningness I don't immediately see one, but how are you thinking it might go?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler@Meaningness The more wealth-extractive your group, the more effective dominance can be, the more parasitical the leaders are?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart@Meaningness OK yeah, makes sense. If your goal is to extract/be a parasite, you won't go beyond the lip of the volcano?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler@paulbaumgart Or maybe: there are multiple routes to prestige, accessible to different sorts of people; only some require s-s.3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@paulbaumgart This has to be true. Although I might argue that all prestige requires s-s, but not all is -EV fitness-wise2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler@paulbaumgart Why would all prestige require self-sacrifice? (Various people have argued that this is true only in Christianity1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@paulbaumgart No one wants to follow a person who's always and only looking out for #1. Even kings lead troops into battle/etc.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler@Meaningness So the goal is to minimize self-sacrifice but still motivate the troops. Amount needed is a fn of power distance?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@paulbaumgart @Meaningness That feels right. And power distance is in turn a fn of how much you need them + their opportunity costs...?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.