@msutherl what causes the transition?
-
-
-
@KevinSimler@msutherl problems with existing ideology become apparent, contact with (true believers of) new one
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@wargfranklin f'yeah!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@KevinSimler a set of convincing and self-coherent arguments. A local max for defensibility. -
@ctbeiser I like this view a lot. But no social incentives (beyond argument defensibility)? - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@KevinSimler Some answers in http://meaningness.com/eternalism-appeal … and its child pages. (Not the only ones, of course! I don’t discuss tribalism, e.g.) -
@Meaningness Thanks. Do you think eternalism makes sense for individual brains (i.e. without a social/tribal context)? - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@KevinSimler Ideological narratives give things emotional context, which is the most (only?) effective way to change our thinking. -
@TristanSevers Is an ideology something it makes sense for a lone individual to believe? - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@KevinSimler the other reason— moral clarity/moral imperatives provide meaning, in huge quantities. Shared sense of purpose is huge. -
@KevinSimler Being able to see yourself as a soldier in a holy war— imagine that feeling. I'd buy in if I could. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.