@KevinSimler but the beneficial outcome to the tribe of the grenade-dive is near-certain, d/t causal and temporal proximity
-
-
Replying to @CTZN5
@KevinSimler the long tail there being, what good could the dead guy have done if he'd lived1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CTZN5
@KevinSimler the suicide bombing is the opposite. All hope lies in the long tail, that it will matter somehow, somewhen, eventually2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CTZN5
@KevinSimler this makes the grenade-dive quite sane, in a game theoretic sense. Suicide bombing requires divine intervention in chaos theory2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler again, the sanity of this depends on a belief in a deity1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler yes, or at least relatively. I mean it's all relative anyway, we're using Bayesian logic, as we should. There's no absolutes1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CTZN5
@KevinSimler I'm speaking from the superrational perspective, of course. The soldier and the suicide bomber are both perfectly rational.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CTZN5
@KevinSimler that was terrible phrasing. They're both quite rational. "perfect rationality" is usually synonymous with superrationality
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.