@KevinSimler @sarahdoingthing I'm using transcendental in the Kantian sense, a kind of idealism economics glosses over, not supernaturalism
-
-
Replying to @hamandcheese
@hamandcheese@sarahdoingthing I think I get it, but an example would do wonders.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@hamandcheese@sarahdoingthing you mean that people *experience* rituals as transcendental instead of economic? (if so, totally...)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@hamandcheese (er, I'm a bit fuzzy on "transcendental")1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler Say I argue that communion is a ritual people do to symbolically signal in-group commitment. Yet if asked that's not the case.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hamandcheese
@KevinSimler The adherent may acknowledge that function exists, but says further that communion is a holy sacrament with intrinsic value2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hamandcheese
@hamandcheese totally. but in my view this is so much of human social behavior! we deny our social motives by claiming they're s.t. else3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler But the social motive can be transcendent / sacred. Forget religious connotations. This is totally accessible to a non-believer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler I mean the social "output" can have a transcendental dimension no matter what it is, religious or secular.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@hamandcheese "sacred" = pertaining to group's core interests(?). "transcendental" = ...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.