@sarahdoingthing @Meaningness 1. Knowledge is never certain. There's no Knowledge with a capital-K, only tentative/hopeful knowledge
-
-
Replying to @KevinSimler
@sarahdoingthing@Meaningness 2. Knowledge best understood as a process of making models better align with reality.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@sarahdoingthing@Meaningness 3. It is a physical process. Computers and other non-humans can (theoretically) generate knowledge too.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@sarahdoingthing@Meaningness 3... E.g. natural selection is a knowledge-generating process, encoding its knowledge in genomes.2 replies 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@sarahdoingthing@Meaningness 4. The most important/broadest thing to say about this process is that it works by conjectures & falsification1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@sarahdoingthing@Meaningness 4... In other words, the only way to get knowledge is to weed out non-knowledge, i.e., ideas that don't work3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @byrneseyeview
@byrneseyeview but theses *are* abundant. My brain has hundreds/thousands/millions every minute! Maybe even 1 or 2 conscious ones1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@byrneseyeview yeah I think so. The "outbound" hypotheses that don't match the "incoming" data get dropped (except in hallucinations)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.