Virtue epistemology starts with real insights; ruins them by forced mis-application to Gettier-type pseudoproblems. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-virtue/ …
-
@KevinSimler Popper had important insights, but disconfirmation is not, empirically, how science actually works.
@Meaningness I take Popper's project as an explanation of how knowledge grows, not how human primates actually do science — FWIW
-
-
@KevinSimler yes… I don’t think separating those is a good idea, fwiw. -
@Meaningness ô_ô By what yardstick, then, do you measure science (or any other knowledge-generating process)? - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness Sounds like a different project from Hutchins'. Any thoughts on Feyerabend/Against Method? -
@KevinSimler It’s been a billion years since I read that. I liked it then, but I think now I probably wouldn’t. Don’t remember much about it - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.