@sarahdoingthing why is it cruel? Don't they need a self?
-
-
Replying to @cathodion
@cathodion if it were so great a thing to have, why such a high value on losing it? ;) (& of course pre-1700 it's the root of evil)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@cathodion the individual self as the core of morality and goodness is a very modern madness - collective selves are not so awful to bear1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing well, since I am an individual self, I supposed I'm biased toward selfhood. Though it's nice to get lost once in a while.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cathodion
@cathodion indeed - it's a very eloquent advocate for itself, despite its many harms1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing good point. I'll just stand by for assimilation.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cathodion
@cathodion@sarahdoingthing Sarah, how self-less do you think pre-modern people were?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler it's complicated - I certainly don't think they were "selfless" in the sense of saints, but group identities and morality...2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing OK that's roughly my sense too — that the modern Western self has been "sharpened" or "heightened" relative to other selves1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
@KevinSimler yes - bearing more weight of meaning, more examined, reflected, and often painful1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@sarahdoingthing I blame all the choices and reason-giving :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.