@edog1203 of course! *smacks forehead*
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@KevinSimler I'm guessing but maybe because they normally grow in rainforests where they need to be tall to reach the light. -
@evokit that's what i thought, but it's supposedly native to the region (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceroxylon_quindiuense …) - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@KevinSimler it's one of the most beautiful places I've ever been! You should go. -
@bigsley awesome! thanks for the first-hand account :). the panorama on the wikipedia page was pretty breathtaking, I must say
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@KevinSimler where else would they grow but up?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@KevinSimler the fact that they were more dense means that there was a lot more competition for sunlight - hence they were tallerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@KevinSimler some hints http://www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/content/2011/f/pt00034p064.pdf … TIL the word "relictual" (state of being a relic)pic.twitter.com/1iRATvwPph
-
@sarahdoingthing@KevinSimler Tree species usually get very tall when they have to compete for light in dense forests. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@KevinSimler I was just there a few months ago. Those trees are at very high altitude because the land they were on was once at sea level.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.