Well that was extremely interesting.
Curious to hear what @ctbeiser and/or @sonyasupposedly think about it. They seem like the people I know who’d have the best triangulation on those subcultures.
-
-
Replying to @KevinSimler @aaronzlewis and
BTW please ignore if you don’t have the time or interest to look over the doc!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @aaronzlewis
Also kinda curious if
@St_Rev has a reaction to all those GenZers memeing about Stirner.... (same caveat as above)1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @aaronzlewis
Lots of interesting content there but the author isn't much of a value add, I think. One site I visit pretty often is leftybooru, an image site for leftypol memes, eg if you want an un-mediated firehose of similar material: https://lefty.booru.org/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=stirner …
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
The post-leftism I'm familiar with isn't an extension of anprim (it's a critique of both anprim and transhumanism, ancom and ancap), but it doesn't surprise me that 17 year olds don't get that. Likewise, Stirner is really easy to misunderstand (he's an epistemologist first).
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
"nor can I find an example of this philosophy manifesting as a real political project" lol, that's the point -- it's everything people do of their own volition that *isn't* a political project, ie everything useful.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @aaronzlewis
Thanks Rev. Anything you’d recommend as an overview/summary/teaser of Stirner’s views? Preferably something short-ish?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @aaronzlewis
Ugh, Stirner's notoriously difficult, and most of his interlocutors (going back to Marx) are obtusely leftist. One tip I can offer is that when he talks about (what is translated as) his 'own' or 'property' he means his relationships to and knowledge of the world.
3 replies 6 retweets 17 likes -
In other words, in an inversion of the koan, if he says the moon is his property he's literally referring to his finger pointing at it. He's an antiauthoritarian anarchist _epistemologist_; his knowledge and relation to the world is inalienably his own.
1 reply 4 retweets 16 likes -
His 'spooks', then, are every attempt by the world to undermine this relationship between me and my (inherently) personal knowing of the world -- every attempt to convince me of some ontologically prior other, like God or duty or morality or...
3 replies 6 retweets 19 likes
Really intriguing summary. One of my oldest and strongest preoccupations is the way social and political incentives corrupt epistemic processes. Would you say that’s also Stirner’s project, or have I projected...?
-
-
Replying to @KevinSimler
I don't think he had a project per se. He wanted to _rant_, because he liked ranting, and he emphatically did not care what people took away from it. But I think it was certainly something he was personally very _interested in_.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.