You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
2. To do all of those new things, there had to be some real "live players" at the helm. More on live vs. dead players here:https://twitter.com/KevinSimler/status/1130175183564656641 …
3. I heard an interview with Hans Zimmer where he described Apollo as an epic art project. I like that framing a lot. IMO the project didn't justify itself _scientifically_. But it was an unparalleled _aesthetic_ achievement.
Apollo 11 was performance art. An audience of billions. Eight years in the making. One showing only. Arguably the most sublime thing ever performed.
4. Using computers for realtime control was pretty new at the time.
It's easy to take for granted now, but in the 60s, computers were typically ~room-sized and communicated by readouts. To hook one up to some actuators and use for mission-critical tasks was 
5. Actually only fine-grained tasks (like landing) were controlled by computer. The mission as a whole was controlled by a massive cyborg. Three people and some electronics up in space + thousands of ppl and many computers on the ground. All linked over a few thin comms channels.
6. I _love_ that the program was named Apollo. Great throwback to the Greeks / an echo from the dawn of science. Pure poetry.
7. Expertise Michael Nielsen has this line in Reinventing Discovery that I really like: “The attention of the right expert at the right time is often the single most valuable resource one can have in creative problem solving.”
During the mission, Apollo had hundreds, maybe thousands of experts carefully networked together and on-call, poised to solve any problem that might arise. A truly staggering concentration of expertise.
8. Singular achievement You might wonder: Why haven't we accomplished anything like the Moon landing in 50 years? Has progress stagnated? Is our civilization in decline?
The answer to those latter questions is "definitely maybe." But I think there's a bigger reason we haven't done something more inspiring than the Moon landing: There's just nothing like it left to achieve.
The Moon landing was a binary, all-or-nothing venture. We either landed or we failed. Whereas almost every other technological advance is painfully incremental. Both failures and (more importantly) successes happen slowly.
By the time we freeze and reanimate a human being, we will have done it a thousand times in mice and monkeys. Self-driving cars are already here, but only kinda sorta. Even AGI must come gradually.
The modern internet is a goddamn miracle. We've made it possible for almost everyone on the planet to communicate instantly and at zero marginal cost. If there'd been a moment when the whole tech stack got switched on, zero to one, it would have blown our fucking minds.
But in reality, the internet was built up slowly. And our appreciation got smeared out over decades, rather than focused onto a single celebratory moment.
What else is out there, similar to the Moon landing? (This is a genuine question; I'd love to hear ideas.) What might we achieve in the next 50–100 years that can be celebrated all at once?
I don't think there's anything quite like getting to the Moon (although I'd love to be proven wrong). Nothing as symbolic and intuitive even to children. Certainly putting someone on Mars will be *awesome*. But it's just not as novel. We already took the low-hanging orb.
So that's why I think the Moon landing was so exceptional. Not because it's a height of progress we won't see again, but because it was our biggest and best shot at a singular technological *performance*. And we nailed it :D
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
