"Understanding just what made liberal values viable starting in the late 1700s, and why they were not before, will be crucial to their survival into the future." I'm hooked
-
-
Replying to @KevinSimler @C_Harwick
This seems like a really underappreciated point. (Certainly it has been underappreciated by _me_, historically ;)pic.twitter.com/28aqKGB5o4
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @C_Harwick
Related to the above, my mind harkens to these paragraphs from https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2009/01/gentle-introduction-to-unqualified_29/ …, which I'm still not sure what to make ofpic.twitter.com/YzuzJd4kmh
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @C_Harwick
"...defines state capacity as a combination of fiscal capacity, 'the state’s ability to raise tax revenue' in a regular, predictable, and non-distortive way, and administrative capacity, 'the state’s ability to enforce rules in a consistent way.'" ^^ seems a v useful distinction
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @C_Harwick
I've opened the North and Weingast article in a new tab, but may never get around to reading it. Would really love some examples to illustrate the self-binding/making commitments dynamic. If I vaguely recall something about Aztec sacrifices here, would I be on base?pic.twitter.com/B5xiXjxqXp
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @KevinSimler @C_Harwick
"I find Michael Mann’s distinction between a state’s despotic power and its infrastructural power useful." despotic P: ability of state actors to have their wishes obeyed (e.g., not countermanded) infrastructural P: ability of the state to actually implement political decisions
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @C_Harwick
Good payoff of newly introduced conceptspic.twitter.com/xr6XfpWOti
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @C_Harwick
First time I encountered this idea (that religion and politics are substitutes) was in an Edge essay by Jonathan Haidt (attached in second image), and it blew my mind. Yours is more precise though. Haidt: https://www.edge.org/conversation/jonathan_haidt-what-makes-people-vote-republican …pic.twitter.com/pr0hFp3kr4
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
@literalbanana I see you liked this tweet (sorry for making a “like” explicit, I know it’s gauche!). IIRC you tweeted some passages recently about politics and religion as canopies making room for other levels of organization (e.g. sports leagues). Can you find and link?
-
-
Replying to @KevinSimler @C_Harwick
Ordinary Banana Retweeted Ordinary Banana
oh yeah - the middle organization level (between kinship and unbundled state)https://twitter.com/literalbanana/status/1147191358827839488 …
Ordinary Banana added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yeah you’re not gonna get much exit and entry on the level of politics/religion (=antagonistic cleavages), which is ofc the problem with eg clannishness as opposed to free but costly movement between clubs.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
