Ok partly kidding, but it’s really being consistently path of least resistance. Sometimes it takes self-awareness to notice when conventional path is high-energy for somebody else’s benefit and do easier thing for your own. Being sufficiently low energy can look like strategy.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
This sounds right to me! And yeah, I wasn’t thinking about it, but “low vs. high resistance” is an interesting axis here. Seems like low-resistance unconventionality is driven by weirdness + self-awareness. Wonder what drives the high-resistance version... ambition?
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
Narcissistic wounds I’d guess. Deep-seated ones. But even that’s really least resistance in disguise: looking inward and processing trauma is too hard intellectually, emotionally, spiritually. So you take easier path of busting through the world.
3 replies 0 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Did you ever write about this? It pattern-matches to “dent in the universe” but I’m not sure I actually read that one (just familiar with the title)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
I think I had a version of the argument long ago in Be Slightly Evil as commentary on Boyd and also a version in Calculus of Grit. It’s gotten highly simplified since them to the self belief “my superpower is sheer laziness”
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @vgr @KevinSimler
The narcissistic wound stuff I think I’ve mentioned in passing in a few breaking smart issues. It’s sort of a gestalt theme with me, but not a very original one.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr @KevinSimler
There’s a related thing about recognizing what’s valuable about things that are generally valued, “the important thing about important things” so to speak. Often the valuable part is cheap and all the cost is attached to low-value parts for signaling reasons.
2 replies 3 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @vgr @KevinSimler
For example: Learning to code well is cheaper and more valuable than getting a CS degree. Building an audience is cheaper and more valuable than getting published by the publishing industry Etc Signaling assets are often more expensive than related primary assets
3 replies 11 retweets 63 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Thanks I needed the concrete examples. While agreeing with the basic point, I wonder: when does one (or you in particular) choose to invest in a signalling asset?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.