In schizophrenia (in my understanding) you have access consciousness and a unified phenomenal consciousness, but you don't feel agency when you act or a sense of self. There is no other "agent", and no other "watcher" in your Cartesian Theater (contd)
-
-
So does that hypothetical other agent have any of 1) access consciousness 2) phenomenal consciousness 3) a sense of self 4) emotion & motivation? Schizophrenics don't even have one whole sense of self, why should they have more than one then? (contd)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
"Tulpas" do *not* have their own access consciousness OR their own phenomenal consciousness. And traumatic memory suppression != tulpa.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't think a tulpa-like "agent" has a "mind" of "consciousness" of its own, or agency for that matter
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Tell what about what? Schizophrenia? Tulpas? Boltzmann Brains? If you ask me why there can't be a 2nd phenomenal consciousness without a 2nd access consciousness: Well, what's the difference between that and Boltzmann Brains?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And then there are all these hairy questions about agency and embodied cognition.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You can read about schizophrenia in a psychology textbook. It's not actually another agent in there, just a feeling of lack of agency.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
In the end, that post just sidesteps previous philosophical work by using the word "agent" in a colloquial manner, smuggling in all kinds of assumptions.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah I don’t see what B-brains have to do with anything. Phenomenal vs access consciousness sounds interesting though
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.