What are you especially sensitive to, the way the princess was sensitive to the pea?
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @KevinSimler
Tacit appeals to or reliance on natural teleology.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @KevinSimler
Oh boy...thread time (sorry). It's fairly widespread in folk (and even some academic) evolutionary theorizing. We're inveterate intentionalizers. One example that sticks with me is that of wild guppies.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AinSophistry @KevinSimler
Male guppies have evolved small orange spots on their flanks that resemble cabrehash fruits, which guppies highly prize. Females are thus pre-wired to approach objects of similar size, shape, and color. So they males with these spots get a reproductive advantage.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AinSophistry @KevinSimler
And as it turns out, the females do too, for the pigment used to make these spots is derived from the fruit itself and absorption of this pigment is impeded by intestinal parasites. So the males with the brightest spots also turn out to be healthier.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AinSophistry @KevinSimler
Now, a common question among those who study animal communication is whether a given signal is honest. Much work on sexual selection proceeds on the assumption that signals of mate quality tend to be driven to honesty due to the choosing sex's greater reproductive stake.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AinSophistry @KevinSimler
This guppy case is puzzling within this framework. The signal seems both dishonest (falsely advertising the presence of fruit) and honest (truthfully advertising parasite load).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AinSophistry @KevinSimler
All that really happened here was that some mutation occurred that, by happy accident, rewarded both its bearers and those attracted to them. To suppose there's a further question of honesty to be answered here is to read more into nature than nature is capable of writing.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
“All that really happened here was [straightforward non-teleological explanation]” — this is a great move and one I wish people (myself included) made more often
-
-
Replying to @KevinSimler
It's easy to forget that most evolutionary explanations are really proxies for historical accounts not accessible in the usual ways. I say this as one with a background in ev psych, where such over-intentionalization is pretty rampant (even in the academy).
0 replies 1 retweet 4 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.