I really appreciate Andrew Gelman's way of defining 'probability' that transcends the frequentist/Bayesian schism: Probability is a mathematical concept encoded in the Kolmogorov axioms. That's it. No need to argue over a canonical interpretation. It's just math!
-
-
This suggests that questions like the following are ill-posed and not worth arguing over:https://twitter.com/3blue1brown/status/1074415844715782144 …
Show this thread -
This doesn't mean that we can't advocate for Bayesianism. I think science should use more Bayesian methods (because it concerns our subjective beliefs about the world). It's just that there isn't One True Way, definitionally speaking.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.