What's the most important thing that has ever happened? A thread about transitions.
Show this thread
-
I'm sure there are many perspectives one could reasonably take here. But for me, the answer is clear. The most interesting, most important thing in the history of the universe is life.
Show this thread
I like @ESYudkowsky's take on this: Before life was the Age of Boredom. Space dust, stars, planets, solar systems: it's just a bunch of blind forces grinding out the same patterns over and over and over.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/spKYZgoh3RmhxMqyu/the-first-world-takeover … ← very good post
-
-
But once you get chemicals arranged in self-replicating bundles, you've entered an entirely new regime: evolution by natural selection. Suddenly there's a process of cumulative change. Suddenly there's LEARNING.
Show this thread -
This isn't geocentrism. Any life, anywhere in the universe, gets us out of the Age of Boredom. It's just, as far as we know (for now), life happened to arise in only one place, here on Earth.
Show this thread -
So, here's our narrative: First, the Big Bang. Then 10 billion years of boredom (give or take). Then life! An explosion of learning! And 4 billion years later, here we are.
Show this thread -
Now, what if we want to refine this picture? What if we allowed ourselves TWO events in our history of the universe? What's the second most important thing?
Show this thread -
I know, there are many perspectives. But again, I think it's clear: humans are the next most important thing. And once again it comes down to learning. Before humans, all cumulative learning took place in genomes. But humans introduced an entirely new modality: culture.
Show this thread -
Yes, brains can learn, and brains existed before humans. But brains die with their hosts, and all their hard-won knowledge has to be re-learned from scratch by the next generation.
Show this thread -
Some animals pass knowledge from parents to children. But the carrying capacity of this "culture" is small and fixed. Humans were the first species with the ability to ACCUMULATE knowledge in culture, in an open-ended way.
Show this thread -
So, again, our story: Big Bang. 10 billion years of boredom. Then life! And 4 billion years of natural selection. Then brains+culture! And a ~million years of cultural evolution later, with all of our farms and factories and computing devices, here we are.
Show this thread -
If this view of history has merit, it suggests that the next truly transformative step will involve a new modality for cumulative learning. Is this AI? Machine learning? The answer is "definitely maybe." But we're certainly not there yet.
Show this thread -
AI systems of today are like the brains of early animals. They're capable of some cool feats of learning, but there's nothing cumulative about them. They're built, they learn a few things, and then they dead-end. Where feedback loops exist, they all pass through human culture.
Show this thread -
The big thing to watch for, then, are AI systems capable of self-sustaining knowledge accumulation. An open-ended machine culture. It's a ways off — but it's coming, and it's very important.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.