"What does Wall Street need nanosecond precision for" = "Why would anyone ever need more than 640k of memory?"https://twitter.com/dschatsky/status/1013035134990344194 …
-
-
Replying to @C_Harwick
Can you elaborate / help me understand this better?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler
Mostly a comment on lack of imagination. Latter is an (apocryphal) Bill Gates quote from the 80s. As for why it's valuable, the NYT article in OP actually addresses it fairly well despite the subtext of "this is frivolous and excessive"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C_Harwick @KevinSimler
Being able to cheaply determine who has rights to an asset in the case of a near-simultaneous buy could reduce a lot of uncertainty!
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Replying to @C_Harwick
ack, sorry, I didn’t RTFA. Makes a lot of sense to want higher precision, given (e.g.) HFT. What I don’t understand are the tradeoffs involved in HFT in the first place.
8:34 PM - 4 Jul 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.