What exactly would you consider justice? Anonymity means it is impossible to consider author bias which is why I am suspicious of all anonymous documents.
-
-
Well an email trail is an email trail whoever opened the computer and pressed 'search' in order to retrieve it, and justice in this case means little more than members being able to express disagreement without fear of expulsion.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
It is the story woven around a them I question. An anonymous author is not objective
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
But they really speak for themselves. To impeach the authour seems to me like deflection.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
No information speaks for itself. There is a narrative woven around it. That narrative is written by someone with a personal perspective. In this case we can not know what that perspective is because we don’t know who they are. This stuff 101 critical reading.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
That's a bit much. Context influences inturpretation, it doesn't create meaning out of nothing. An archeologist digging up a pot and saying 'this is Troy' when it isn't makes the pot misinturpreted. It doesn't make it *not a pot*.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JohnWallcraft @tracey_crosbie en
When memebers of the staff in central office boasted about giving the location of Dianne Abbott to the press when she was weeping in the loos after recieving a death threat. That's a pot.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Have you read this paper? http://journals.academicstudiespress.com/index.php/JCA/article/view/54 …pic.twitter.com/tas4Bq8g5R
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
I couldn’t resist this reply Tracey
- ‘There is a narrative woven around it. That narrative is written by someone with a personal perspective.’ It applies equally to the article you quote. I suspect the discussion is academic as hopefully Forde will properly consider it1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
When you know who an author is you can consider what their potential bias might be. With an anonymous report that is not possible. This stuff isn’t difficult to understand it is obvious!
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
No patronising Tracey ....
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.