Focussing on people who think #coronavirus is a hoax despite scientific evidence of its existence allows you to ignore the real debate around whether or not #lockdown was and is a reasonable and proportionate response.
The Left seem completely unable to engage this discussion.
-
-
What if 50,000 of those who might have died without lockdown were doctors and nurses - that would have had terrible consequences on current and future patients as well as their own families. Your ‘what if’ approach has too many variables to make decisions on. Pragmatism is key
-
Both of our approaches are based on pragmatism. Not a Nazi-like indifference to life. You literally begin your tweet with 'what if', yet apparently my own 'what if' approach apparently has too many variables, despite data showing lockdown countries faired no better than others.
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
1. Economic fallout is a fact. Its already happening. You dont care about suicide rate? The increase in abuse? These lives (below)? 2. You're literally guessing a future scenario. It hasnt happened & imperial college model has been severely questioned. https://news.yahoo.com/coronavirus-two-million-bangladesh-jobs-230536987.html …
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
