I must admit I don't see what's wrong with it. There may be many people with limited bodily mobility for whom a drive around for half an hour helps keep them sane and, he's not right about much but you can't catch anything alone in your car 1/2https://twitter.com/KevinPascoe/status/1243897450567516160 …
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
Als antwoord op @Juliadoe51
Obviously your choice and you may get fined for a non-essential journey. The risk of RTCs tying up emergency resources is also a factor. I do recognise the challenge facing those with mobility difficulties though
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @KevinPascoe
For now fines can only be issued where groups of people congregate in public & refuse to disperse. Presumably there will be police presence in urban areas where there might still be high volumes but I can't see resources being wasted in rural areas with little or no traffic 1/2
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Juliadoe51
Are you sure on the fines? I think non-essential journeys are in the remit. The police would only get involved I suspect at sightseeing hot spots and if there was a traffic incident - the first question they’d ask is why are you driving. As I said it’s a choice - but I’m not
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @KevinPascoe
I also have a friend - even older than me who doesn't drive so is stuck at home. I shop for her, pick up her prescriptions and so on and do the dog walk all in one trip.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk
Now that’s essential Julia
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.