guardian bah!
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Or has pressure put on it?
- Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
It seems the Guardian is


itself in case it has upset the 1% elites Kevin -
Can't stand the guy, but it's shitty journalism, whoever it's about. There's plenty to hold him to account for.
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Not quite, just the section about the death of his son, which of course should not have been mentioned. I too lost a son. It should never be politicised

-
I fully sympathise on the loss of a child. The now deleted article was focused on NHS funding not his sonpic.twitter.com/KlbEqCqeAu
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Disagree Kevin . At the end of the day losing a child is the biggest tragedy a parent can face. Asquith might have been the PM who took the UK into the war . He lost a son in the trenches . When he was given the news in no 10 he cried. Criticise the politician but not the father
-
I think the original article was focused on health funding thoughpic.twitter.com/3ZHsgLhU6s
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
I am occasionally tempted to subscribe to the Guardian’s online edition but as long as it behaves in this craven manner I’ll be keeping my money for better things.
- Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.