Your post throws shade on jess, thus is denigrating.
-
-
I asked a question (there was clearly a question mark) so how is that denigrating?
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
You suggested she should be deselected, hence thrown shade, hence denigration.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
I didn’t - I asked a question
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
So, no inference (or preference) on your side at all?
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Not in that question - it was simply a question
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Interesting. It’s not how I read your initial post, you seem (to me, at least) to be dissembling your actual position, or initial intent. In any case, I suggest you consider the popularity of Jess Philips, she speaks for a broader church than some realise.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
These are my exact words - it’s a question - ‘Grounds for the Labour Whip to be withdrawn from Jess Phillips?’
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @KevinPascoe @_AndyHemming en
Shall we just park it up and get on with our lives? Take care
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Sure, Liam & I know where we stand.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks
It’s ok
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.