I think we know Formby isn’t right. She’s hiding behind rules to make her own failings
-
-
That is an assertion without any substantiation. True, she inherited a mess, but the actions taken since to rectify process failings have been transparent for all to see. Those who oppose Corbyn are just stirring things up for their own ends.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 4 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @redwater1 @tim2040 en
She said she dismissed any complaint before she took over in 2016 because they weren’t handle correctly and now talks of a backlog. And staff are in tears. But I can’t assess that as Formby not doing well. Jog on
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
If you are saying that all complaints pre her tenure have been dismissed, then you are wrong. That would obviously be unfair to all concerned. But she has introduced a robust system for managing new complaints, which Watson was undermining.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @redwater1 @JFr4ser en
Terry can I say well done on this thread and keeping focused on facts. I’ve seen references in it to a position that could ‘arguably’ be taken. In all my governance roles I would be horrified if officers recommended serious action on the basis of ‘it could be arguably said’
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @KevinPascoe @redwater1 en
It’s a fact that Corbyn’s aides interfered in the complaints process, despite it being an alleged GDPR breach when Watson even suggested it. DP is rarely about facts; mainly it’s about what’s arguable.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @tim2040 @redwater1 en
Governance is about managing risk. In the absence of facts, I wouldn’t make a decision based on ‘I think’ or ‘It’s arguable’ from a single source. I would listen to a range of experts or an industry body with a collective view. These give a defence if there are legal consequences
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @KevinPascoe @redwater1 en
Data Protection is principles-based legislation that requires the creation of a well-argued case. If any of my bosses had demanded facts when I was a DPO, I would have had to quit. As it was, they understood what kind of law we were dealing with.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @tim2040 @redwater1 en
Can you signpost a sector body or professional body that would validate your opinions on the specifics of this case ie the points you said were ‘arguable’ or ‘I think’. Although I’m a Corbyn supporter I’m genuinely trying to be objective
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @KevinPascoe @redwater1 en
I don’t think NADPO or the IAPP give opinions on specific cases; feel free to ask them. I’m sorry my 18 years of working in this sector, including gaining a masters in information rights law and practice and 8 years of working as a DP trainer and consultant aren’t enough.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk
Thanks so much for your time Tim. It’s not that I doubt you personally, I am naturally prudent and look for validation. Take care
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.