No. Let’s waste billions on Trident that makes US corporations very rich, instead of investing in practical defence needs for the UK. Madnesshttps://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1078246660835368963 …
Je kan informatie over je locatie aan je Tweets toevoegen, bijvoorbeeld je stad of exacte locatie, via het web en applicaties van derden. Je kan altijd de locatiegeschiedenis van je Tweets verwijderen. Meer informatie
Critically manpower in the army, surface fleet size (inc. small craft for our waters), proper military martime surv. aircaft and generally an overreliance in all services on small number of high cost / high complexity assets eg F35. It’s about numbers we can’t afford with Trident
You can’t ‘buy’ manpower - scrapping Trident won’t help that. Small fleet size, not sure I see your point - we’ve got both Rivers (B1 & B2). Poseidon’s on order, and has been budgeted alongside Trident, Sentinel and A400M can also perform MPA role.
You need dedicated MP assets - not converted airliners and general transports. You are taking the sales patter nonsense of the aero companies.
F-35 is a world class asset, of course it’s going to cost. It’s an aircraft for the future, there is no cost alternative. It has again been budgeted alongside Trident for well into the future
Except the forces can’t have the numbers of F35s they were promised
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.