I've noticed a trend developing. Our polling is slipping the more Labour MPs and members mention a 2nd Referendum. I strongly believe this was the wrong policy for Labour to adopt and will, as Paul Mason says, damage us in a GE.
#newsnight
-
-
Als antwoord op @chelleryn99
The Labour Party needs to do the right thing by the country - which is stop Brexit.
3 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @PublicPriestley @chelleryn99
How exactly do Labour stop Brexit as a minority party - the Tories are in power. A Lib Dem has defected to vote with them. These are the people you need to have a go at
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @KevinPascoe @chelleryn99
They start by declaring a position. Most opposition parties do this without a majority.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @PublicPriestley @chelleryn99
Position on Brexit is clear. If possible find a Brexit that delivers benefits for all of Britain (inc being part of a CU / SM) that respects the democratic wishes of the referendum via a GE, but if all else fails then a 2nd (divisive) referendum that could still go either waypic.twitter.com/iKRNrNBvpd
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @KevinPascoe @chelleryn99
Yes - the referendum was won on a knife edge majority that was obtained through lies and illegal and undeclared funding - the Labour policy is all 'ifs and ands'. It should be clear that it's time to do the right thing and remain.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @PublicPriestley @chelleryn99
The electoral commission had said the overspends/ illegal spends by both campaigns didn’t make a material difference. These aren’t personal the opinions, it’s an objective analysis by electoral professionals
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @KevinPascoe @chelleryn99
On your bike. "there was wrong doing on both sides" - Google 'who broke electoral law brexit'. Not only did Leave over spend, they found new and innovative methods of breaking the law and subverting the vote. That's not personal opinion. The vote was tampered with significantly.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @PublicPriestley @chelleryn99
My opinion and yours count for nothing here. It’s the Electoral Commission that does - that’s why they exist
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @KevinPascoe @chelleryn99
At one stage President Nixon was declared not involved in Watergate by the FBI. The FBI. Let's see how this all plays out. They haven't followed Aaron Banks' dirty money trail yet. It stinks. And no, Corbyn doesn't have my vote. Count that.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
Take care
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.