I find it weird that you keep saying the IG report vindicated Nunes @EliLake. Nunes put forward a set of specific claims that were dubious, and the IG report did not confirm them. The IG report instead found a bunch of different problems.
-
-
-
Relying on uncorroborated opposition research to obtain a FISA warrant on Carter Page was the central Nunes claim. That was corroborated. As I write in the piece, Horowitz uncovered more damning details.
- Još 9 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
There are a lot of bad misstatements of material facts in this article. For example, Carter Page left the Trump campaign before FISC granted the first FISA warrant against him.pic.twitter.com/9zp9GAaFrm
-
Literally in the next paragraph: "And while the electronic surveillance of Page did not begin until after he had left the campaign in October 2016, the FBI was given license to comb through his past texts, emails, and phone records.”
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Why? It's full of egregious factual errors. I'd rather watch small children coloring outside the lines than have to fact-check someone who has NEVER been a surveillance critic until white men were targeted.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
-
Good night... too funny
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Why?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I'm all about reading across the political spectrum, but I'm not sure I understand why I need to read this.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.