I didn’t see Tony Heller on the list. Worthless.
Any ranking of climate scientists that puts me ahead of Isaac Held is highly suspect, but this is an entertaining (and perhaps infuriating) list nonetheless. This list was developed by people who are not in a position to evaluate scientific contribution.https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/climate-change-scientists-list/ …
-
-
-
Yes he is.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Too many men on this list.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If it's missing this guy it seems like a shaky listhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Alley …
-
That is truly nuts, yes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Disappeared academics List includes Nordhaus but not
@RichardTol (H=108) No Lindzen ( H=67), Christy,@curryja (H=70) etc 500 place on the list of 1000 has H=30 Lists lists lists Political fun 'n games cloaked as science -
The "field citation ratio" is unkind to people who are cited across disciplines. Ditto for
@clarivate's Highly-Cited Cross-Field. I'm too cross-field to be picked up by their metric. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Who are the top five people who should be consulted for such a list attempt?
-
Assessing scientific contribution is a highly subjective matter. It is hard to distinguish scientific contribution from social standing. And it is hard to assess non-scientific factors contributing to social standing.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"This list was developed by people who are not in a position to evaluate scientific contribution." Seems "this" transcends "this" in the specific context.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.