Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I don't want to start a pile-on of this person. But I do want to plead with tenured faculty to STOP LYING about "productivity" and meritocracy. "A successful post-PhD (academic) career" mostly depends on luck, privilege, and connections more than anything else. Period.pic.twitter.com/EVc7i0f7hI
And at this point it's actually lying. Even if lying by ignorance b/c it's been decades since you've been on the job market yourself. If you're telling EC scholars that research productivity is the key to landing academic jobs you are lying.
(i know this aint the point but youre a much better person than i am for sharing this redacted)
Honestly, the “hang in there” responses, though well-meaning, are equally shitty.
I met someone from an Ivy who had just started a TT before having defended & had never written a conference paper, much less an article. Merit!
Oh wow much merit such productive
Tenured faculty are going to cling to these myths until the last TT line is cut.
Given the ratio of PhD produced by a professor over a career compared to number of professorships how is it mathematically sustainable for everyone to be able to get a job when it’s not uncommon for professors to advise 15+ (at least in my field) PhD students in a career.
It's about political will. There is enough work to go around for lots more PhDs than currently those w/secure employment, as evidenced by how heavily dependent schools are on adjuncts and contract faculty.
Perfectly put..
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
