"Congress shall make no law regarding an ESTABLISHMENT of religion..."
-
-
-
Quick lesson in late 18th century grammar and syntax: that capitalized word is a verb, not a noun, because "regarding" is the modifier.
-
So, simply put: Congress (And executive orders by modern understanding ) can't rule on anything which would establish a religion, including
-
Allowing healthcare or insurance providers using gov funding to discriminate on a religious basis. Meh.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The GOP is just really rally disgusting and gets more so every day. Sorry not sorry if that sounds too harsh but FFS it's 2016
-
2017! But I agree! By 2020 we may be living in the social equivalent of 1820 if religious right have their way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It allows employers to opt out of the contraceptive coverage requirement under Obamacare. That's a huge deal.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Whatever happened to seperation of church & state? I don't want to hear a sermon telling me who to vote for
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you Kelly! Reads like Bannon & Miller rhetoric. Main focus on wiping out all of Obama's legacy. Still hateful towards women/LGBT
-
Who'd of thought an EO could be written to sound hateful &'douche-y' but leave it to them.
-
What can we expect from the folks who wrote, "American carnage" for the inaugural speech? They extinguish any spark of goodness in any issue
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Unhinged partisan fanatic"That's awesome!Gotta love the interweb.I guess M.McConnel saying he'll say NO to everything on day 2 was welcoming
-
Tweet unavailable
-
This convo is about an EO to narrow the separation of church & state, affecting people's choices/rights, not name calling & hate. Read

- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Of course Hobby Lobby & GOP are fine w/covering ED pills and penis pumps but if you have a vagina? Get outta here w/ that!
-
They also only care about their OWN religion (Christianity) They wouldn't support the same religious freedom protections for Rastafarians
-
Tweet unavailable
-
It is federally illegal for Rastafarians to participate in religious sacraments (using Cannabis)
-
It's also still illegal at the state level in the vast majority of states. So much for religious freedom; only for Christians.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.