It's a crime, it's harassment, but it's not violence. It's humiliation, not physical harm.
-
-
Replying to @RaniTanuki @KazuyaShinogoto and
how throwing some solid object to someone is not violence? even if we say its not violence, it's still crime as you said. How its ok for him to call for crime?
1 reply 0 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @kurumuz @KazuyaShinogoto and
To help fight the threat of even greater crimes. Things like this are only done to nazis or borderline nazis. I'd personally rather have someone be hit with a milkshake than have them spread a strong and violent message of hate without significant action taken to counter it.
16 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @RaniTanuki @kurumuz and
You know you can counter speech with speech right? Or do you really wanna go down to the road of violence because its “easier”
2 replies 0 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @KazuyaShinogoto @RaniTanuki and
Good thing speech worked in the 1930's, and the Nazis never did anything bad because of that
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HThomps67810 @KazuyaShinogoto and
Speech didn't work because the Nazis used political intimidation and violence to suppress it, much as you are advocating.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sanity @KazuyaShinogoto and
K if speech didnt work how should the Nazis have been stopped in the first place?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HThomps67810 @sanity and
Nazi:*desires the use of force to threaten any opposing view in order to silence anyone who dares challenge them in a rational debate* Maybe if you guys stopped promoting violence to “fight” your opponents in a debate then there wouldn’t be any problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KazuyaShinogoto @HThomps67810 and
Debating those views gives them a platform to spread & legitimizes them as acceptable positions. Even if you're right, if you're not good enough at debating you might seem wrong to those around you & "lose" the debate. It's safer to avoid giving them a platform and stop that risk
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RaniTanuki @HThomps67810 and
When someone gets a platform and says “people should be legally be allowed to kill each other” and people start clapping then I would consider your methods acceptable. But then that theory of yours require that people are stupid enough to give away their human rights.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
But honestly, how hard is it for you to convince anyone that everyone should live without killing each other. Its like your confident that people want to be kill other people without consequences.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.