This one paragraph (including the entirely reasonable preceding idea that is rejected here with "philosophy schmosifph") confirms everything I've been suspecting about @nytimes . We saw it in their primary endorsement show and again here. There are no adults in the room.
“Philosophy schmosiphy,” wrote a researcher at the Times whose Slack avatar was the logo for the hamburger chain Jack in the Box. “We’re at a barricades moment in our history. You decide: which side are you on?”https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/11/inside-the-new-york-times-heated-reckoning-with-itself.html …
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
What’s more annoying the lack of self- reflection in upper ranks of the paper, or the access journalism the paper plies?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Maybe if they spend less time on Slack and Twitter they might actually turn out a decent newspaper.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The NYTimes utterly failed, always using "even coverage" over actual truth, in their coverage of Trump for over five years. It took them four years to use the word "lie". It has been a catastrophe.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.