Pelosi says $600 UI payments should be tied to the jobless rate, shrink as economy improves. (More on that idea here: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/dont-know-how-much-stimulus-is-needed-put-it-on-autopilot-some-say-11593957600 …) She cites Yale study we reported on that found no evidence the payments are discouraging people from working: https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-600-a-week-in-extra-unemployment-aid-deterring-people-from-seeking-work-11596015000 …
-
-
Progressives in the House and Senate have embraced this idea. The advantage: benefits will stay in place automatically, without an arbitrary end date or need to renegotiate. Why shrink payments at all? As the jobless rate comes down, it should be easier for workers to find jobs.
Show this thread -
Another good summation of the rationale: https://twitter.com/elskuhn/status/1289936377854013440?s=21 …https://twitter.com/ElSKuhn/status/1289936377854013440 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It should be obvious now that Pelosi is the problem, not the solution
-
The virus is the problem, controlling it is the solution. Until we listen to scientists and follow their instructions any aid is simply a bandaid, not a solution.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So how does the trigger work if the $600 makes unemployment higher? “In CBO’s assessment, the extension of the additional $600 per week would probably reduce employment in the second half of 2020, and it would reduce employment in calendar year 2021.” https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2020-06/56387-CBO-Grassley-Letter.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which makes zero sense. Do my bills go down as other people go back to work?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.