How do you deal w/ problems of the Digital age by interpreting the Constitution as it was written b4 we had indoor plumbing
It’s vital any member of the Supreme Court think of their rulings not just in a theoretical way, but how laws can affect real people.https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/826596974501699584 …
-
-
-
Founders had no concept of Metadata, Big data, Computing Cycles, Predictive Algorithms, etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If Gorsuch believes in "strictly interpreting the Constitution", why would he accept a stolen SCOTUS seat? Art. 2 Sec 2??
-
It wasn't unprecedented that Garland wasn't chosen. The seat was not stolen.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
that’s the job of the legislature when they pass the law.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bottom line this is a stolen seat. Should not get a hearing/vote until Garland does. Nothing to do with views at this point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd add that just because something is legal, that doesn't mean it's ethical. Strict interpretation ignores societal ethics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
e.g. Druley v. Patton and Norsworthy v. Beard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do not confirm him because of repubs refusal to have hearings for Merrick Garland.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Discussing
#NeilGorsuch for#SCOTUS is like being in a pawn shop & discussing the price to buy back your stolen TV#StolenSeatThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.