That was the houses job and they didn’t do it.
Americans understand why firsthand witnesses and all available evidence must be brought before the Senate. A trial without witnesses is no trial at all.
-
-
-
Go back to sleep.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thought the facts were not in dispute
. How can you have a compelling case and yet need more witnesses -
Facts aren't in dispute but Trumpers.whine it's all second hand information. So let the first hand witnesses testify. Afraid of truth?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also, a trial without having committed a crime is no trial at all.
-
I think you missed this part of what a Senate trial is in your civic class. We called it Government when I was in school.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Then the House should have called them.
-
The house called several times for witnesses and docs ...trump repeatedly refused. That is why he is charged with Obstruction of Congress
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Just like those same witnesses you dems called for that had nothing during the House trial?
-
I hope if you are ever sued your attorney allows witnesses. That said, I now know how to get out of jury dutypic.twitter.com/EcKVBBQeRI
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.