Why didn’t NANCY call first-hand witness during the house investigation?
It is imperative that the Senate hear from first-hand witnesses and have access to additional evidence in the impeachment trial. We must clearly show the American people this trial is a pursuit of truth—not a cover-up.
-
-
-
Because Trump blocked them! Pay attention dude
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You have the articles the House presented to you. These are what the Constitution dictates you must vote on. Do not attempt to "Kavanaugh" this process.
-
They already have! Parnas = Swetnick
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The house had the opportunity to call or subpoena who they wanted to hear from. They chose to rush this sham through. Hope Mitch does the same.
-
Did you just close off your senses to Trump stonewalling all witnesses that were subpoenaed? If you or I just disregarded a subpoena, there would be a bench warrant for our arrest. Did you close your senses that Trump was given the opportunity and turned it down?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I have a feeling that this is gonna be a very quick trial. Nancy shot herself in the foot when she decided to sit on these weak impeachment articles. It will be “no evidence on quid pro quo” next!!!
-
His Chief of Staff went in front of the camera and admitted that he did it & said it was normal and to " get over it "....
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.