It would be wholly inappropriate for the Senate to advance any judicial nominee who Trump nominated while he’s on trial. This is a win for our democracy.https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/senate-judiciary-pauses-nominations-for-impeachment-trial …
-
-
-
I'm just gonna play this for myself when I need a pep talk.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Senator Harris I support you. I have a question for the Senate. If a senator has publicly stated they believe in Trump's innocence, as have both McConnell & Graham, is there any Senate rule that can be applied to recuse those w/preconceived bias?
-
The Democratic house members found POTUS guilty before the impeachment process even began. Gimme a damn break!
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
-
Yep, and they took it to the courts to decide. To bad the House couldn't do it this time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Dems should really consider filing more impeachment articles (they would be legit) and keep doing so for no other reason than to prevent any more judges from being appointed.
-
I agree, file more baseless articles. Trump will be the first impeached president re-elected in a landslide, and impeached a second or third time if the DEMS hold the house. That would certainly seal his legacy, as well as that of the Democratic Party. Love the show.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Keep fighting. Keep pushing. Keep positioning yourself to be the VP nominee.
-
We have the Vice-President! And after the next 5 years Pence can be President. That's what Pelosi is really afraid of.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.