You can’t call it Medicare for All if it’s not, you know, Medicare for all.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your plan is not Medicare For All, no matter how many times you tweet it out.
-
Yes it is... Everyone will be covered/paid for by Medicare. People who want to buy extra insurance, similar to Medicare Advantage plans, can do so.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It is strange to bring a policy this big out so late. It means she either just thought of the idea now, or it is a political calculation that doesn't reflect her true thinking on the issue.
-
Who needs Medicare for all when you can start a business in a disadvantaged community after receiving a pell grant
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I and most everyone will qualify for actual Medicare by the time your watered down healthcare plan is implemented (And this is totally not
#MedicareForAll. Shame on you for stealing Sen. Sanders and Rep. Jayapal’s legislation branding).pic.twitter.com/w7oKcBdtUWThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A sad misuse of the term Medicare For All.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And yet, if you do "Medicaid for all", it will be $20 trillion in the next decade. Good plan!
-
$20 trillion over a decade is much, much less than $3.5 trillion per year... That would be the biggest policy success of the century.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Medicare Advantage for All just means more private profiteering to run up the $6 trillion even sooner. That's the "Advantage" part.
-
lol you're mad because Kamala has a better plan
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.