Wait. I thought it was her body, her choice? Now I have to pay for her "choice" to abort her child?pic.twitter.com/qg5cLMbflJ
No woman's access to reproductive health care should be based on how much money she has. We must repeal the Hyde Amendment.
-
-
-
I didn't choose to believe Dubya when he lied about Iraq but my tax dollars are still paying for that atrocity. I didn't choose to play around w/tariffs so my taxes would bail out farmers, but I am.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
We must keep saying this over & over. My body My Choice Your body Your Choice It's not my business what other woman do or why. It's not my place to agree or disagree it's not my uterus.pic.twitter.com/QknCWqJ3Uo
-
Yes! My body, my choice.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The Hyde amendment is there to insure that the MILLIONS of taxpayers who do not want innocent babies slaughtered, do not have to be complicit in their deaths! Abortion is not healthcare!
-
Totally Agree!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When you knowingly-and-willfully risk procreating another person, and somehow succeed despite trying to minimize that risk, then I struggle to believe that you may wantonly terminate that life. It's not a tumor or a parasite, but a fellow person with equal rights plus a future.
-
I also struggle to believe that it's right to compel others to pay for such things. We used to call that practice theft. Now, it's simply called "redistribution of wealth." This is a much pleasanter term to use, but it doesn't change the fundamental nature of the practice.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nobody's access to any healthcare should be determined by how much money they have
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.