To be honest, I think there are many more priorities since lynching (murder) is already a crime.
-
-
-
Well, you're not in danger of being lynched so you don't get the full gravity and symbolism of the act. Even as late as today, it's a fear for a lot of us.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
They actually have had one for ≈ 130 yrs. The travesty is why this PC Congress hasn’t urged prosecutions under the existing statutes.
-
Kind of like enforcing the immigration laws that are already on the books.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I believe 99% of the people in this country believes that lynching is wrong. Why would you need to make a law against it. The
#demonrats are condoning murder of babies up to birth. Now that’s wrong. -
If it’s so trivial, then let’s just pass it and get on to other things.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I agree with you it should definitely be labeled a Federal Hate Crime. It should have been labeled that during the
#RedSummer1919 and#100yearsoflynching#ADOS faced. It is still an epidemic now just not widely televised. America needs various policies in place to protect ADOS -
Grateful that you and Sen Booker worked on that. Can you also work on
#ReparationsNow for#ADOS for reparative justice for the free labor in slavery, the wealth stolen during Jim Crow and all the damage of mass incarcerations.#HR40BILL needs to turn into a Policy. This can help - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It's so cute when Democrats want to sound all law-and-order. Me, I'd get the government out of the mind-reading business, abolish the entire category of "hate crime," and just focus on dealing out actual justice for actual actions.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.