And that was great technique just leaving that answer hanging.
During the hearing for Attorney General nominee William Barr, he said that a wall would address drug trafficking issues. I then asked if he was aware that most of the drugs that are trafficked enter through ports of entry. He said he was.
-
-
-
Mimi, you should run for office. I'm with you in wanting more detail. And I'm with you that Democratic senators are not pinning him down on his positions.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
He’s evidence-resistant, and intellectually-dishonest. Not AG material. He’s just looking to make a legacy for himself. Another Trump opportunist.
-
Evidence-resistant is my new favorite term
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There is no chance that man will put the good of the nation above the good of the Republican Party.
-
Don't do it!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So the follow up should've been: "How would a wall stop drug trafficking, if drugs come through legal points of entry? Please explain that to all of us."
-
No follow up needed. She exposed who he is. Unfortunately that will have zero impact on voting.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I missed some of the testimony, has anyone asked him if he was asked to take a loyalty pledge to
@realdonaldtrump? Or if he was 'The people's lawyer' or working for trump? 'Cause a man who WAS AG and doesn't know what emoluments clause is, well, someone's lying. -
That surprised me a little, him claiming not to know, and then offering up the most narrowest of Definitions. How is it that he's not aware of what's been going on in the courts? Head in sand much or simply mistruths?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.