Kamala, just STOP IT! This is part of THE SWAMP our POTUS is trying to remove. Most people who work for private companies do not have this protection. WE, THE PEOPLE, should expect the best & our representatives should have the ability to FIRE someone if they can't do their job.
This executive order is a direct assault on the fundamental collective bargaining rights of over 2.1 million workers. We must fight back and stand with them.https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-25/trump-signs-executive-orders-cracking-down-on-employee-unions …
-
-
-
Yeah? What about teachers? They have unions and they are under paid as it is. As it is, many schools cannot hire more teachers because of adequate salaries. Unions protect teachers and able them to bargain for raises. But sure. Why would you want teachers?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No. It’s about time that fed workers be held accountable for their work instead being entitled to a job for life regardless of performance
-
Jobs for life? Who told you that? Where do people get these kind of ideas?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Trump is acting like a dictator- why aren't his executive orders being challenged in court the way some of Obama's Were?
-
Because....McConnell
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Big business has always hated unions, because unions make it possible to acquire a livable wage from company. Less profit for shareholders, and believe me they dont give a damn about the $10 hr worker who has no health benefits because the company has that worker at 37 hrs a week
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Paying
#costly#expensive#retirement#benefits to#MiLLiONS of#Federal#Workers will eventually#exceed our ability to#pay.#Bloated#Governmenthttps://twitter.com/truthsearch1957/status/1000548563963863040 … -
Be passed with the hundreds of thousands dollars that Pruitt has spent on private jets, first class air tickets, huge security costs, sound proof telephone booth what top secret information does an EPA secretary have? Or is unethical deals he is cutting, quid pro quo?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
We all knew this. Some chose to ignore his past and then-current practices, thinking (I guess) that he’d (a) run the government like a business (and he unashamedly is!) and (b) become more “presidential” (he pathetically hasn’t/won’t/can’t).
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.