Huh! Good thing we ~all~ saved PDFs
Astonishing that the publisher has not made a public statement @wileyinresearch
-
-
-
I mean, they specifically say it's citable, but then make changes without any acknowledgement. Especially since they have kept the same DOI for both (substantively different) versions.
@C0PE - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ha! Just caught that too. Those linotype machines can be tricky...
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They /removed/ the criticism (which involved analyses of Gid's twitter profile pictures). Not really defenisible. Besides I've read all six MAs in this piece and JPAs was pretty badly lacking.
End of conversation
-
-
-
You are engaged in science-denial. There are no changes to the paper published: "the available evidence suggests average global IFR of ~0.15%" - Euro. Journ. of Clinical Invstgn. Also published on US NIH website (which always applies further peer-review before posting any study)
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.