It definitely is. In fact I would say having more co-first authors is more ethical than current system.https://twitter.com/ivanoransky/status/776443624615579649 …
-
-
Als antwoord op @pathogenomenick
But how do we determine who is the first first author?
2 antwoorden 1 retweet 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @ClausWilke @pathogenomenick
All authors should given a contribution weight and the names appear in a random order each time you look at it.
4 antwoorden 1 retweet 3 vind-ik-leuks -
Simple: pre-2015: alphabetical. Post-2015: reverse alphabetical.
#solved.1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
I just met a Professor Aardvark who would like to collaborate with you.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Oh, Aaron?
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Yes Aaron Aardvark. He wants to collaborate with you since 2001.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
I'm afraid that's not going to work - Dr. Aardvark and I don't get along. Something about authorship.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
He wanted the paper to be referred to as (Awesome Aardvark 2016)?
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk
Précis! And I told him there could only be one Awesome in this world and Aardvark wasn't gonna cut it
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.