"we see no clear evidence of selection for stronger ACE2 binding, consistent with SARS-CoV-2 already possessing adequate ACE2 affinity at the beginning of the pandemic"https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.17.157982v1 …
-
-
We have a manuscript under editorial consideration on the pangolin CoVs published by the 2 groups (which are not independent). The CoVs are so identical (99.95%) that they use the same dataset to construct their genomes. Majority of the RBD sequence hails from a single sample.
-
I think it's imperative for the 2 groups to make publicly available the sequencing data that they used to generate their full genome sequence. And for someone to look into the smuggled pangolins from March 2019, Guangdong, before it becomes impossible to trace.
- Nog 14 antwoorden
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
"Identifying & cataloguing the viruses carried by pangolins is a logical approach to evaluate the range of potential pathogens & help with conservation." The most trafficked mammal on Earth & they go after viruses! No, more like part of a wet market story!https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893680/ …
-
Oh. The RBD doesn’t bind. The samples were from 1% to 26.4% by mass human. Human 100% full length unique reads all over the SRA. as the GD S1 is different—even that still infects humans 2x+ better than pangolins. This did not evolve in a pangolin at all.pic.twitter.com/Oms2FqgtJC
- Nog 4 antwoorden
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.