It is worth pointing out that the referenced new CDC 'study', which has been described as a "comprehensive analysis" is neither that, nor is it an actual study - it's just a summary overview of what other studies have found (all of which show we missed the boat - no question).
-
-
Deze collectie tonenBedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Redfield set CDC’s credibility on fire for his boss, and it’s an absolute disgrace. I don’t take anything from them at face value anymore.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Notice that in making his preposterous statement, he doesn’t even use correct terminology: “We were never blind when it came to surveillance for Coronavirus 19” What is “Coronavirus 19”?! The CDC Direct doesn’t even know what it’s called. No wonder their surveillance failed.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Director Redfield’s actions and statements have turned the CDCs credibility into a dumpster fire. Rank and file in the actual hospitals working could care less what the CDC says, thinks, or makes a graph of.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Redfiel’s a liar with no credibility. My household was prepared before the federal government was.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
And then there is HydroxyQ. Used early with zinc. Would have saved elderly.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Let's not even talk about Redfield's record of rewriting history. Shall we discuss his illegal continuation of HIV "vaccine" trials with formulations they knew didn't work on military members? How about his internment of military members with HIV into "Quarantine Barracks"? 1/2
-
And yet, Redfield's record on HIV was lauded during his confirmation hearing, despite having been charged with (later dropped under suspect circumstances) research misconduct. To think that he was in any way capable of running an agency dedicated to public health was laughable.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
I'm not an epidemiologist/public health person/a doctor: to me CDC Director Redfield is lying & revising history/timeline. The CDC was thoroughly slow-footed, scrubbed data on its website, contaminated lab, bad testkit 1 & had to produce 2nd testkit & didn't make enough.
-
There is not evidence that all this behavior is in the past. Eyes wide open, this book is still being written.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
