".... after a single importation from China"? Really? We know this is definitely not true.
-
-
This is a fairly comprehensive overview of the earliest US cases. Or you could stop reading after disagreeing with the semantics in the embedded image. It's not suggesting single lineage introduction and expansion. Just describing the nature of the first event.
-
I agree - the overview is nice and I provided some comments to a few journalists earlier today mentioning as much. However, I'm deeply concerned about headlines like this - that is not actually what the studies show (as summarized in this one).
- Nog 2 antwoorden
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
CDC would appear to be basically disintegrating as a credible public health agency.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
I agree — the headline hilights the early introduction from China, not the multiple subsequent independent introductions from Europe. So, nuanced epidemiological reading required at all levels .. fine for us, but for the lay audience .. good luck with that?
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
The wording here skipped the ignorance of CDC and pointed a finger to another target to blame. Sure thing is that all lineages originally relate to China，but what did CDC do before their spreading to USA via Europe？
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.